|
Horse
racing draw advantage bias Ayr 1m
Stalls usually positioned
Low
Link
to course and distance menu Race
Of The Week
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
11 |
|
111 |
1 |
11 |
|
11 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
<--Good or better --> |
2 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
|
|
27
|
13
|
Copyright © 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|
This is quite a weak pattern probably due to the distance of these races, but the chart
shows a good advantage to the Bottom half of the draw on good or better going.
Stalls Low. On good or better going, the
Bottom half of the draw won 27 of 41 races 65%.
(Result 6 of 11
was dead centre).
Under those conditions in 2005, stalls 1 - 3 won 3 of 4 races.
In 2006, the Bottom half won 4 of 6 races.
On good/good to soft in places or
softer going (results shown in red),
the Bottom half of the draw won 18 of 32 races 56%.
That is a very low percentage for 6 stalls.
2006 results :- 4-8, 5-8,
8-8, 4-9, 7-9, 8-9, 8-10, 11-12,
4-13, 10-13, 13-13,
1-14, 2-14,
4-14, 6-14, 8-14,
|
|