Horse racing draw advantage bias BRIGHTON 5F + 59 yds
Stalls usually positioned LOW (High are shown H)

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8 1 1 1111     11 1
9   11 1 1 1 H1 1 1H 111
10 H11 11 11  11 1 111 11 1111 1  
11       111 11  1     11 11  
12 1 1   1   111    1 1     1 
13 11V 1      1 1 1 1     111 1  
14   1    1            1       1
15               11         1      
16   1 1 11         11 11 1   1     1
17                                  
18                                    
19                                      
20                                        
21                                          
22                                            
6 8 5 13 4 7

<--Good or better -->

5 8 6 8 8 5
40 33

Copyright 2005 [Howard Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

Result 1-13 V was a void race, and is excluded from this analysis.

This course and distance used to qualify for the Stalls To Follow list.
Results favoured stalls 1 to 6 on good or better going, but the bias has looked less pronounced in recent seasons.
On good or better going, stalls 1 - 6 won only 9 of 21 races during 2003 and 2004, won 6 of 12 races in 2005, and 6 of 9 in 2006.

On good or better going, in races with 8 - 20 runners,  :-
The Top 6 stalls won 40 of 75 races   53%
Stalls 1 - 6        won 43 of 75 races   57 % a difference of only 3 races.
There is no recommendation.

On good/good to soft in places or softer going, the Top 7 stalls won 12 of 16 races.  2 from 2 in 2006.
The Top 7 stalls are those highlighted in blue, plus the next cell to the left in white.
Stalls 1-4 won 3 of 14 races, but 2 of those races had only 8 runners..
Note however, that there is no real clustering of these results and that 16 races is quite a small sample.

2006 results :- 2-8, 4-8, 7-9, 8-9, 2-10, 8-10, 5-11, 6-12, 11-13, 2-14, 10-16