Horse racing draw advantage bias CATTERICK 6F
Stalls usually positioned LOW (
High are shown H )
Link
to course and distance menu
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
|
1 |
11 |
1 |
|
1 |
1H |
1H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
111 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
11 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
11 |
1111 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
1111 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
111 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
1 |
1111111 |
111 |
111 |
11 |
111 |
11 |
1 |
11 |
1111 |
|
1 |
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
13 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
<--Good or better --> |
7 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
6 |
8 |
|
|
45 |
29 |
Copyright © 2003 [Howard
Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|
These races take place on a Left handed course, with a bend of almost 180 degrees.
Some other advice may recommend a Low advantage in Catterick sprints, but this
is a very weak pattern and results are not reliable.
The 2003 and 2004 results distorted this
pattern in favour of the Bottom 6 stalls.
8 of 11 races in 2003 were won from stalls 1 - 4.
5 of 8 races in 2004 were won from stalls 1 - 4,
but in 2005, 7 of 11 races were won from the TOP 6 stalls.
In 2006, stalls 1 to 6 won 8 races, the Top 6 won 5.
On good or better going, there are obvious spreads of wins in races of 8, 12,
and 14 runners.
In races of 8 or more runners, with stalls positioned LOW, stalls 1 - 6 won 47 of
76 races 61 %, a low percentage for 6 stalls.
The 3 results with stalls positioned HIGH are interesting, winning from the top 2 stalls but
these races only had 8 or
9 runners.
There is no recommendation.
On good/good to soft
in places or softer going,
results are spread across all stalls throughout this chart.
2006 results :- 3-9, 1-10, 4-11, 5-11, 5-12, 7-12,
8-12, 11-12, 12-12,
1-13,
2-14, 2-14, 7-14,
8-14, 14-14
|
|