Horse racing draw advantage bias CATTERICK 6F
Stalls usually positioned LOW ( High are shown H )

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8   1 11 1   1 1H 1H
9 11 1  1         1 1H
10 11 111 1 1 11 11  1   1  
11  1 1 1  1 1 1111        
12 11 1111 1 1  1   1 11 1 1111 11
13 111        1   1            
14 1 1111111 111 111 11 111 11 11 1111   1   111
15                                
16                                
17                                  
18                                    
19                                      
20                                        
21                                          
22                                            
11 13 7 5 6 5

<--Good or better -->

7 7 3 3 6 8
45 29

Copyright 2003 [Howard Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

These races take place on a Left handed course, with a bend of almost 180 degrees.
Some other advice may recommend a Low advantage in Catterick sprints, but this is a very weak pattern and results are not reliable.

The 2003 and 2004 results distorted this pattern in favour of the Bottom 6 stalls.
8 of 11 races in 2003 were won from stalls 1 - 4.
5 of 8 races in 2004 were won from stalls 1 - 4,
but in 2005, 7 of 11 races were won from the TOP 6 stalls.
In 2006, stalls 1 to 6 won 8 races, the Top 6 won 5.

On good or better going, there are obvious spreads of wins in races of 8, 12, and 14 runners.
In races of 8 or more runners, with stalls positioned LOW, stalls 1 - 6 won 47 of 76 races 61 %, a low percentage for 6 stalls.
The 3 results with stalls positioned  HIGH are interesting, winning from the top 2 stalls but these races only had 8 or 9 runners.
There is no recommendation.

On good/good to soft in places or softer going, results are spread across all stalls throughout this chart.
2006 results :-  3-9, 1-10, 4-11, 5-11, 5-12,
7-12, 8-12, 11-12, 12-12, 1-13,
2-14, 2-14, 7-14, 8-14, 14-14