|
Horse racing draw advantage bias
CHEPSTOW 1m
Stalls usually positioned High
Link
to course and distance menu
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
111 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
11 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
11 |
111 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
4 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
4 |
<--Good or better --> |
4 |
4 |
5 |
3 |
8 |
10 |
|
|
30
|
36
|
Copyright © 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|
A very weak pattern.
On good or better going, in
races of 8 to 14 runners, stalls 1 to 6 won 21 of 30 races 70%.
In 2006, stalls 1 to 6 won 4 of 6 races under those conditions, but in 2005
there was 1 win in 2 races and 2004, only 2 wins in 5.
Over such a long distance, this apparent bias could easily be coincidence.
Past results have not been consistent.
There is no recommendation.
On good/good
to soft in places or softer
going, wins have been spread across most stalls.
2006 results :- 7-8,
5-9, 2-10, 9-10, 4-11, 6-11, 4-12,
5-12, 12-12, 6-14, 1-15,
1-16, 3-16, 5-16,
10-16, 13-16, 14-16,
|
|