Horse racing draw advantage bias LINGFIELD 7F (Turf)
Stalls usually positioned HIGH

Link to course and distance menu     Race Of The Week

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8 1   1     1 111  
9   1 11   1 1 111C    
10 1     1 1111 1 1     1
11 11 11   11 1   1 11 1 1 11C
12 1 1         11   1 1 11 1111
13         1C   1 11     1 1  
14 1   1         1       1111   1
15     1 11     11   1 1   11 11   1
16 1       11     11 11 1 11   1 1111 1  
17 1 1     1       1 1   1       1 11
18 111 1     1 1 111 11 1 1 11 1111 1111 111 111 11 11 11
19                   1   1              
20     11       1 1 1 1   1 1   11   1 1 11  
11 4 5 5 11 4

<--Good or better -->

12 5 9 15 9 12
44 64

Copyright 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

There are obvious spreads of results throughout this chart.
The best that can be said of this pattern is that on good or better going, the Top half of the draw has been favoured, 64 wins against 44 from the bottom half.
4 other winners were drawn dead Centre.
On good or better going, the Top 6 stalls won 62 of 112 races 55%.
That is a very low percentage for 6 stalls.
Stalls 1 to 6 won 40 races.

On good/good to soft in places or softer going, the Top half of the draw won 31 of 42 races 74%.
6 of those wins came in 2005.
There were no races on that type of going in 2006.
In races of 10 to 16 runners, the Top 6 stalls won 14 of 18 races 78%.
There are good supporting patterns in 5F and 6F races on going softer than good, but the distance of these races is having a detrimental effect on this pattern.

2006 results :-  7-8, 7-8, 4-10, 5-10, 5-10, 11-11, 2-12, 12-12, 12-13, 8-14,
7-15, 1-16, 1-17, 7-18, 12-18, 12-18, 14-18