|
Horse racing draw advantage bias
LINGFIELD 7F
+ 140yds (Turf)
Stalls usually positioned
HIGH (Centre shown C)
Link
to course and distance menu
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
C |
|
|
C |
111 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
C |
|
1 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
C |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
1 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
1 |
1C |
C |
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
CC |
|
|
1 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
4 |
2 |
|
11 |
5 |
<--Good or better --> |
5 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
20
|
23
|
Copyright © 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|
A very weak pattern.
On good or better going, in races of 8 - 14 runners, the Top 6 stalls won 17 of
26 races 65%.
As field sizes increase, wins spread to lower stalls.
Although there is some good clustering of results, especially in races of 8 to
10 runners, it may not be a good idea to read too much into those figures.
7 and a half furlongs on a straight course, is a very long distance over which
to expect a strong, reliable pattern to form.
With so few runners, and such a long distance, these results could easily be
coincidence.
In 2006, the one qualifying race was won from stall 1 of 8 runners.
On good/good
to soft in places or softer
going, there are not enough results for an accurate assessment.
2006 results :- 1-8, 4-8,
6-18, 15-18. All had stalls placed Centre.
|
|