Horse racing draw advantage bias NOTTINGHAM 5F
Stalls usually positioned HIGH ( Low are shown L )

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8 L 11 1 1 1 1L11 1 11
9 11  1L   1   1 1 L 1
10 1 1 1   1 1   1 1 1
11   1   1     1 11      
12             1 1 1   11 1
13 1   11           1        
14 1                            
15 1 1        1     1            
16           1                    
17     1   111       L 1 1            
18             1           1 1 11      
19                                      
20                                        
21                                          
22                                            
4 5 3 2 3 3

<--Good or better -->

3 4 3 3 3 4
17 20

Copyright 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

You may see draw advantage advice recommending "High numbers best" or words to that effect, but there is not much to get excited about here.
This all looks very even.
On good or better going, both stalls 1 to 6 and the Top 6 stalls won 20 of 37 races.
There are obvious spreads of results in races of 8 and 10 runners.
On good or better going in races of 13 or more runners, the Top 6 stalls won only 1 of 11 races.
5 of those 11 races were won from stalls 1 to 3 in races of 13 to 15 runners.
Those 2 observations could suggest that as the number of runners increases, better ground is to be found towards the Centre of the track or at least away from the High running rail.
In races of 16 runners or more, wins are spread, so it may not pay to read too much into those 5 results.
Also, 11 races is a very small sample.
There appears to be no other visible pattern.
On going
good/good to soft in places or softer, wins are spread across most stalls.

2006 results :- 5-8, 6-8, 4-9, 7-9, 3-10, 4-11, 9-10, 12-12, 5-17, 10-17

2005 results :-   1-8, 4-8, 8-8, 9-9, 6-16, 11-1