Horse racing draw advantage bias REDCAR 7F 
Stalls usually positioned HIGH ( Centre and Low are shown C and L )

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
No

of

R

U

N

N

E

R

S

8 1C       11   1 1C
9 1 1 1 1 1 1      
10 1 1CCC 1 1   11C1     1 1C 3yr olds and older
10 seasons results
1997 - 2006
11 1C   111 1C   C 11 11C1 1CC 1  
12   11         1C   1      
13             1   1       C
14 C     1   C   1C   1   C 1  
15   1C 1C       111 11             11
16             111       1   1 1    
17                   1 C       C   C
18 1   1     1   1                   C
19           1 1                 1 1    
20       CC   11         1   1C   1          
21 11                                        
22                                            
23           1               C                  
24   C               1   1 1                      
25         1                                        
26 1 1                                                
27                                                      
28                                                        
29         1         1       1               1       1      
30                 1               1                          
10 10 7 6 5 11 <--Good or better --> 5 7 9 4 3 5
49 38

A very weak pattern.
Results are spread across most stalls throughout this chart on all types of going.
Different positioning of the stalls appears to make little difference.

On good or better going, the Bottom half of the draw won 49 of 91 races 45%, a very low percentage for up to 15 runners.
The Top half of the draw won 38 races.  4 other winners were drawn dead centre.
On good or better going, stalls 1 to 6 won 49 of 91 races 54%,
That is a very low percentage for 6 stalls.
In races of 21 to 26 runners, the Bottom half of the draw won 9 of 10 races, but 10 races is a very small sample, and a very narrow part of the overall chart.
Over such a long distance on a straight course, and with so many runners, those results could easily be coincidence.
There is no recommendation.

On good/good to soft in places or softer going results are spread.

2006 results :- 8-8, 4-9 (H), 2-10, 6-10, 1-11, 6-11, 8-11, 1-14, 8-14, 11-17, 17-17 (H), 18-18
All had stalls Centre except where indicated.

2005 results :-   2-10, 9-11, 7-12, 7-13, 4-20, 4-20.  All had stalls Centre
                        5-9, 6-9, 11-16, 14-16, 3-18, 6-20.  All had stalls High.

Copyright 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.