Horse racing draw advantage bias
SALISBURY 1m
Stalls usually positioned HIGH sometimes Centre (C).
Stalls positioning is only shown for 2004 and 2005.
Link
to course and distance menu
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
|
C |
11 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
1 |
C |
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
1 |
11 |
111 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
11 |
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
1C |
C |
1 |
|
1 |
|
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
11 |
|
11 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
1 |
1 |
1C |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
C |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
11 |
1 |
|
11 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
1 |
1C |
|
|
11 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
1C |
|
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
111 |
1 |
1 |
111 |
1 |
11C |
|
111 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
6 |
14 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
<--Good or better --> |
7 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
7 |
6 |
|
|
48
|
45
|
Copyright © 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|
A very weak pattern.
You may see advice such as "High numbers best up to 1m, except on soft
going when Low best", or words to that effect.
Clearly, winners have been spread across most stalls during the last
10 years on all types of going,
Central positioning of the stalls seems to have made little difference to
results, except perhaps on good-soft
or softer going - stalls 1
and 2 won 3 of 3 races in 2004 and 2005.
3 races is of course a very small sample.
On good or better going, the
Top 6 stalls won 47 of 95 races 49%.
Stalls 1 to 6 won 46 races
2 winners were drawn dead centre.
There is no recommendation.
2006 results :- 6-8, 8-9,
1-13, 2-13, 3-13 (C), 8-13,
3-16, 13-16, 15-16
|
|