Horse racing draw advantage bias
SALISBURY 5F
Stalls usually positioned
HIGH ( Low are shown L, Centre shown C )
Link
to course and distance menu
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
No
of
R
U
N
E
R
S |
8 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
L |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
1 |
1C |
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
L |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
<--Good or better --> |
0 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
11 |
14 |
|
There are not many races here.
Historically, this has been a pattern of no advantage, and as things stand at
present, results are looking spread across all stalls throughout this chart.
Central positioning of the stalls in the last 2 seasons has had little impact on
the draw.
On good or better going, the Top 6 stalls won 14 of 25 races 56%.
That is a very low percentage for 6 stalls.
Stalls 1 to 6 won 11 of 25 races.
There is no recommendation.
2006 results :-
10-12, 12-12, 6-16 All had stalls placed Centre.
2005 results :- 6-14 (C), 2-10, 11-11
2004 results :- 9-9,
3-12, 3-16.
Copyright © 2005 [H
Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
|