Horse racing draw advantage bias THIRSK 1m
Stalls usually positioned LOW

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8 111 1111 111   11 111111 11 1
9 1       11       11
10 11 1   1 1       11 1
11 1   1 11       111      
12   1 1 1 1 1 1 11   1   1
13 1 1 1 1   1       11     1
14   1   1 1111       1       1  
15   1   1 1     1         11 11  
16     1   111 1 1           1   1  
17   1 1 1   111 11 1     1 1       1  
18 11111 111 111   111 11111 11 11111111 11 1111 11 1 1 11 111 11 1 11
19                                      
20                                        
12 12 11 8 12 15

<--Good or better -->

5 5 5 10 4 6
76 34

Copyright 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

A weak pattern.
On good or better going, The Bottom half, Top half split favours the Bottom half by 76 wins to 34.  A ratio of 2 : 1.
On good or better going stalls 1 to 6 won 70 of 112 races 62%.
In races of 10 or more runners, the Bottom half of the draw won 65 of 89 races 73%.
In 2006, Stalls 1 to 6 won 7 of 7 races on good or better going.

On good/good to soft in places  or softer going, the Top half of the draw
won 24 of 33 races 72%.
In 2006, the Top half won 4 of 7 races under those conditions.
With the stalls positioned Low, these are the horses drawn away from the running rail, towards the Centre of the course.
As a general rule, results on that type of going do not produce reliable patterns worth following.

You may choose to follow these trends, but from a draw advantage point of view, the distance of 1m should be seen as a big negative.
Historically, this has been a pattern of no advantage.
Coincidence could easily be at play here.
There is no recommendation.

2006 results :- 1-11, 4-11, 12-12, 1-13, 10-13, 5-14, 9-14, 4-15, 5-15, 2-17, 6-17, 6-17, 9-18, 15-18

2005 results :-  1-8, 5-8, 6-8, 5-9, 9-9, 10-10, 8-11, 8-11, 6-12, 6-13,
15-16, 11-17, 1-18, 2-18, 3-18, 4-18, 14-18, 14-18, 16-18