Horse racing draw advantage bias THIRSK 7F
Stalls usually positioned LOW

Link to course and distance menu

WINNING STALL NUMBER

 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
No

of

R

U

N

E

R

S

8   1 1         111
9 1111     11 1 1 1111 1 111
10 11 1     1 11   1 1 1
11 1 1   11 11   1   111 1  
12 1 11   11   1 1     1   11
13   1 11   1   1   1 1 1    
14   1 1 111 1 1 11   1 1111     11  
15           1             1 1  
16 1 11 111 111 111 111 111 111     111 111 1   11 1
17                                  
18                                    
19                                      
20                                        
9 8 7 11 6 5

<--Good or better -->

7 8 1 10 8 10
51 41

Copyright 2005 [H Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.

You will probably see draw advantage advice for Thirsk such as "Low numbers best 7F and 1m" or words to that effect, but on good or better going, the Bottom half of the draw has only been marginally favoured over the Top half.
There is quite a long sweeping bend into the straight in these races, shortly after the start which probably has some influence on that advice.
In theory, this should be to the advantage of horses drawn Low next to the rail, but this is a very weak pattern.

On good or better going, the Bottom half of the draw won 51 of 93 races 54%.
Stalls 1 to 6 won of 46 of 93 races 49%, and the Top 6 stalls won 44, a difference of only 2 races.
That is a very low percentage for 6 stalls.

On good/good to soft in places or softer going, the Bottom half of the draw won 7 races, the Top half won 8.
1 other winner was dead centre. 
Wins are generally spread, with any advantage only very marginal on any type of going.
There is no recommendation.

2006 results :- 4-9, 2-10, 12-12, 5-13, 11-13, 3-14, 7-14, 13-14,
                      4-16,
8-16, 11-16, 15-16

2005 results :-  8-8, 1-10, 7-11, 4-12, 2-13, 3-13, 10-13, 6-14, 9-14, 10-14,
4-16,
5-16