 |
|
BEVERLEY 5f
A good example of a
HIGH draw advantage pattern.
This
chart shows horse racing results for horses aged 3 years or older
only.
The results are plotted winning stall number against the
number of runners.
The resultant chart shows the
Draw
Advantage Pattern
produced by
the winning stall numbers.
|
Results on good or better going are shown in black.
Results on good/good
to soft in places or softer going
are
shown
in red.
On the top row of the chart,
you can see that in races with 8 runners, there were 2 wins from stall
number 5, and 1 win from stall 8.
In races of 9 runners, the winners started from stalls 2, 4 (2 wins, one with
the stalls positioned LOW), 5, 8, and 9.
In races of 20 runners, the wins came from stalls 1, 3, 4 (3 wins), 5, 7,
11 (2wins),
12 (2wins), 13 (5 wins), 14 (3 wins), 15 (2 wins), 16, 17 (4 wins), 18 (7 wins), 19 (3 wins), and 20 (8
wins).
The positions of the Bottom 6 stalls (directly below stall numbers 1 to 6)
are highlighted in yellow.
The positions of the Top 6 stalls are shown highlighted
in blue.
As the number of runners increases, the positions of the Top 6
stalls appear diagonally.
You can easily see that the majority of wins have come from the Top 6
stalls.
|
BEVERLEY 5f
Stalls usually positioned HIGH (Low are shown L)
|
|
WINNING STALL NUMBER |
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
| No
of
R
U
N
N
E
R
S |
8 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
|
1 |
|
1L |
1 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
3yr olds and older
10 seasons results
1997 - 2006 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
111 |
111 |
11 |
111 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
|
|
|
11 |
1 |
11 |
|
11 |
|
111 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
1 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
1 |
11 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
111 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1111 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
11 |
|
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
|
|
| 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
| 20 |
1 |
|
1 |
111 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
11 |
11111 |
111 |
11 |
1 |
1111 |
1111111 |
111 |
11111111 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
<--Good
or better --> |
11 |
9 |
11 |
14 |
12 |
19 |
|
|
16 |
90 |
Copyright © 2005 [Howard
Hutchinson]. All rights reserved.
Copying text or any other kind of content from a web site is a criminal offence.
Totals are shown at the bottom
of the chart for results on good or better going for the Bottom 6
stalls, the Top 6 stalls and the Bottom half of the draw (16 wins) and the Top
half (90 wins).
This is a very well known draw advantage,
and is an excellent example of a High draw advantage pattern.
You can see immediately that the Top 6 stalls (the cells highlighted in blue),
have won far more races than all the other stalls put together.
Analysis
The most influential factors in these races, are the going, and the number of runners.
Both these factors have a negative effect on this draw advantage.
On good or better going, (results shown in black),
in races of 8 - 20 runners :-
The Top half of the draw won 90 of 108 races 83 %.
The Bottom half won 16 races.
2 other winners drawn 5 of 9
and 6 of 11 were dead centre).
The Top 6 stalls won 76 of 108 races 70 %
The Top 4 stalls won 56 of 108 races 52 %
As the number of runners increases to near maximum fields, this advantage
deteriorates :-
In races of 16, 17 and 18 runners, you might consider the Top 7
stalls, rather than just the Top 6.
In races of 19 and 20 runners, you might consider the Top 8 and 10
stalls,
rather than just the Top 6.
On good or better going, in races of 8 - 18 runners, the Top 6 stalls won
51 of 66 races 77%
On good or better going, in races of 8 - 20 runners, stalls 1 - 3 won only
5 of 108 races. 2 of those wins came in 2005.
On good or better going, in races of 8 to19 runners, only
5 winners were not
drawn in the Top 8 stalls.
They are the results, winner drawn 1 of 12, 3 -14, 3 -
15, 5 -15, 6-15.
The Top 8 stalls are the Top 6 highlighted in blue, plus the next 2 adjacent
stalls highlighted in white.
On
good/good to soft in places or
softer
going, (results shown in
red),
results are less consistent, especially as the number of runners increases
:-
In races of 8 to 20 runners, the Top 6 stalls won 23 of 38 races
60 %
In races of 8 to 13 runners, the Top 6 stalls
won 15 of 22 races 68 %.
In
races of 16 or more runners, the Top 6 stalls won 8 of 16 races 50%
2006 results :- winner drawn 8
of 9, 7-10,
5-12, 7-12, 4-13,
7-13, 7-14, 6-15, 15-15,
15-15, 7-17,
16-17, 10-18, 13-18, 4-20,
13-20, 14-20, 14-20,
Results on good to soft or softer shown in red.
These results
are on the chart.
During 2006 on good or better going, results shown in
black, the Top 6 stalls won 5 of 11 races.
On good or better going, in races of 8 to 18 runners, the Top 6 stalls won
5 of 8 races.
During 2006 on
good/good to soft in places
or softer
going, results
shown in
red, the Top half of the draw
won only 3 of 7 races.
The Bottom half won 3 races, and one winner drawn 7 of 13 was dead centre.
compare
what you see here with any other draw advantage advice.
STARTINGSTALLS.CO.UK
presents the only draw advantage advice
which shows the patterns produced by winning stall numbers.
All the results of several seasons can be seen, showing you EXACTLY what
has been happening on the racecourse.
That is what makes this
information
PROBABLY THE BEST DRAW ADVANTAGE ADVICE
IN THE WORLD.
Chester 5f and
Beverley 5f are draw
advantages that everyone knows about, but they are by no means the only
strong patterns in the country.
Many
very significant draw advantages go largely unnoticed.
Draw
advantages are an untapped source of vital racing information.
They can
work for you.
|
|
|
|
